> Bear in mind that no one is forcing the employee to accept this.
That doesn't quite absolve the employer e.g. if I am stuck in sahara desert and bump into a man starving for days. At this time if I offer him food in return for his soul, would you consider it a fair trade? Even though the poor guy has a choice to reject my offer?
So, trading away one's soul might be considered short sighted and there's a whole argument to be had with regards to the state preventing us from making short sighted decisions, so lets say that the desert rescuer was demanding the starving life savings or something.
It would certainly be a horrible person who would demand that much for saving a person's life. But if the only reason that this or other person was holding rescue patrols in the desert was that they were hoping to strike it rich exploiting lost souls, then as a society we either ought to allow this or use taxpayer money to fund our own rescue patrols.
And remember that as a laborer you're not in anything like this situation. There's a lot of charity out there and though this won't make your life pleasant it will make you far better off than starving in the Sahara. And there is more than one potential employer out there bidding for your labor. And you can see that the system works because very few jobs only pay the minimum wage. If we were somehow to get into a situation where there was only a single employer in the country than I'd say that at that point some sort of government intervention might be called for.
>So, trading away one's soul might be considered short sighted
Starving to death instead of trading away your soul is more short-sighted; the metaphor has nothing to do with deferring pleasure or information asymmetry. It's about power asymmetry.
Being in a weak position while negotiating a deal doesn't imply either being less informed or having less self-control than the person on the other side.
Absolve him from what, exactly? A potential employer is in no way obligated to "give you a job." It is expected to be a fair trade of skill for pay. If you don't like the terms you're offered, you can go somewhere else.
Absolve him from what, exactly? A potential employer is in no way obligated to "give you a job." It is expected to be a fair trade of skill for pay. If you don't like the terms you're offered, you can go somewhere else.
That doesn't quite absolve the employer e.g. if I am stuck in sahara desert and bump into a man starving for days. At this time if I offer him food in return for his soul, would you consider it a fair trade? Even though the poor guy has a choice to reject my offer?