> I'm sure their $1.5t infrastructure commitments are based on hitting certain goals.
If you're so sure, can you share your source?
> Their comment about government support for data center is isn't a call for a bailout and taken out of context/exaggerated by mass media.
The context was vague, but the idea that she was conveying is well understood - basically she was saying "we're going to get so big and so important for basic societal needs in the US that if we ever become insolvent the US government can step in and make sure we survive".
> Yes but Google also beat the incumbents in Yahoo, AOL.
If you're so sure, can you share your source?
> Their comment about government support for data center is isn't a call for a bailout and taken out of context/exaggerated by mass media.
The context was vague, but the idea that she was conveying is well understood - basically she was saying "we're going to get so big and so important for basic societal needs in the US that if we ever become insolvent the US government can step in and make sure we survive".
> Yes but Google also beat the incumbents in Yahoo, AOL.
That was my point - did you even read my comment?