What point are you trying to make? I'm honestly not sure. Is it that China is po...

BoredPositron · 2025-10-30T17:22:29 1761844949

They they are exceeding their initial commitment. Talking about pollution in your tone is also a bit rich coming from the biggest net polluter in all of history.

nomel · 2025-10-30T21:09:30 1761858570

What percent difference in reduction do you see if they didn't sign the treaty?

BoredPositron · 2025-10-30T21:45:48 1761860748

Doesn't matter they committed to a target and exceed it. We see two countries with stagnation (changes below 1%) and regressions... one is the us.

nomel · 2025-10-31T18:24:34 1761935074

I think it does matter. My questions is, was their progress in any way related to the treaty, or would it have happened anyways?

BoredPositron · 2025-11-01T02:32:36 1761964356

Nobody can know and that's why it's interesting to you... arguing in bad faith. Take your unfalsifiable counterfactual challenge and go back to debate club.

nomel · 2025-11-03T05:08:55 1762146535

Or, we can look at their communicated plans before the Paris agreement...