Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Inches/feet/yards and miles just remain separate things, never mixed

How tall are you, maybe 70 inches? Or 5⅚ft?

178cm or 1.78m are so obviously equivalent it doesn't matter which is used.

> 12 inches in a foot and 3 feet in a yard make extremely convenient divisible factors.

This requires you to start with 12 inches. If you're making a cupboard to fit in an 18¾" (476mm) space, it's no use, or is only randomly useful.

If you can choose, then you can just as easily start with 36cm. For example, European kitchens are designed around a 300mm base size.






> How tall are you, maybe 70 inches? Or 5⅚ft?

Are you purposely doing this? That is obviously not what I meant. Nobody says "3 miles, 500 feet", they say "3.1 miles". Effectively two systems of distance measurement: inches/feet/yards (near scale), and miles (distant scale).

"5 feet 10 inches" is completely normal and fine.

> This requires you to start with 12 inches. If you're making a cupboard to fit in an 18¾" (476mm) space, it's no use, or is only randomly useful.

So you cut the cupboard to fit a 18¾" space, no big deal. Same as anything else, and just as random as 476mm.

Typically they come in (integer!) 12-inch, 24-inch, 36-inch, or 48-inch variants.


This is honestly the problem with critiquing any system from without: you don't know what's really wrong with it.

Fucking bushels, man.


They are talking past each other. One is saying, "metric is better than imperial", the other is saying "imperial works". Neither claim is relevant to the other.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: