Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yep it's an odd take!

I was last a "web developer" almost two decades ago, but dipping back in on a few occasions I am always appreciative of how much innovation has happened since then.

The world before the huge investment in browser technology was dark. Tables and spacers for meaningful layout and flash or shockwave for anything interactive.

I remember a time when css based drop down menus were seen as some sort of state of the art.




> I remember a time when css based drop down menus were seen as some sort of state of the art.

They still are on mobile for navigation - full screen sans js


Yes, presenting a large catalog of products (a few hundreds), for discovery purpose an efficient menu is still a big challenge in term of UX and technical implementation all the more when portability, accessibility, and cross-devices is taken into account.

Things that definitely look like trivial banality at shallow level often end up to need a lot of attention on many concurrent details.


Uh, a guess is that 1+ billion people are already good at using "drop down menus" along with check boxes, radio buttons, single line text boxes, multiline text boxes, push buttons, links. So, when those user interface controls are sufficient for the purpose, using something else might reduce the collection of happy users. The Web site of my bank stays close to such now classic controls.


Maybe this misses the point slightly?

I'm talking about a time when investment in browser development and web standards was so lacking that being able to achieve things like this blew everyone's mind:

https://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/menus/demo.html

Hackernews, were it around back then, would've gone as crazy for this post as we do the latest AI model today.


> Maybe this misses the point slightly?

Maybe! My thoughts were, say, tangential or incidental.

A guess is that a central issue is how much in new features should we develop and use?

I see a dilemma: (A) I mentioned the old controls that go back to early Windows and even IBM's 3270 terminals. An advantage of these controls is that lots of software tools implement them and billions of people already understand them. (B) Being too happy with the old stuff or even the present risks progress that is possible and worthwhile.

Your post seemed to illustrate (B).

But generally in the industry, with smartphones, laptops, desktops, Apple, Google's Android, Windows, browsers, apps and extrapolating, we could have an explosion of new features that would complicate work for everyone and fragment the industry.

Ah, maybe Darwin would explain: Lots of mutations with only the best lasting??

For my work, I'm thrilled with the tools and technology available now that I get to exploit.


It shocks me that I remember css/edge so well after all these years.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: