This could be interesting if it were a study, but it’s just an thinly disguised ad for your consultancy.

I use Copilot mostly with C++, and found that frequently it has problems with simple codebases also. Beside that it rarely suggests anything newer than cpp17, and very frequently it suggests C snippets...

I don’t know how this is in more established languages, but in my experience there is a big problem in conflating versions.

In Elixir, I constantly get code with API calls that conflate different versions. As amazed as I can be in some contexts, with fast moving libraries I get nowhere fast.

I’ve been wanting to try vibes based coding, but can hardly get off the ground.

Clickable link: https://cursordoctor.com/

"Cursor developers", sure. The joke has gone too far

Not even Java devs lacked that much agency to call themselves "Eclipse devs"

Nobody will know wtf a "cursor developer" means in 6 months

Not blaming anyone for following the hype and trying to make a buck out of it of course

Consultants are now grifting the AI grifters that love "vibe coding".

So that's what it has gotten to.