Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Of course there is always a bottom 20% of the ivy league class. What differs is:

if u lower academic metrics to admit racially diverse students, these students will all be in bottom 20% unless university changes other factors.

To prevent bottom 20% from all being racially preffered students, the univ or professor has the choice of either lowering level of education to allow racial students to compete, just give them better scores for being racial, or just let them be the bottom 20% of class because they cant keep up with the other academic merit based students.

Some Ivy professors such as Amy Wax have discussed this, mentioning racially admitted students are always in bottom of class, the current process sets them up to fail rather than pushing them to state school where they might be top of class,racial students have never been in top of her classes, as expected the university is trying to revoke her tenure.




Pushing then to state schools where they might be top of their class has psychological benifits for the student, if i am #1 in level 2 math vs the worst student in level 1 math, i can take pride in my academic success, this will encourage me to study more rather than feeling like the worst student in class. If i knew my high school put me in level 1 math intentionally knowing i would be the weakest student, i would be mad at the high school.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: