The BBC are starting to say that 'tech people are saying this is Crowdstrike', so I guess it's just a question of being certain? Perhaps we'd have similar concerns about rigour in journalism if it were to turn out that it's actually not Crowdstrike specifically, it's caused by the interplay of Crowdstrike and some other currently unknown thing, and actually it's not Crowdstrike that's behaving improperly, but this other currently unknown thing.
It's looking more and more like Crowdstrike screwed up, but I appreciate rigour and accuracy more than FRISTTT!!! type announcements.
It's looking more and more like Crowdstrike screwed up, but I appreciate rigour and accuracy more than FRISTTT!!! type announcements.