Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>I think most people would trade opacity and fancy buttons for MS Teams to be able to load in under a minute.

It's a paradox. If you don't make it look fancy, smooth, and appealing, you lose out to those that do. Even if you have a better product, that doesn't mean you can sell it on merits of being more technically efficient. Especially to more casual consumer or to business heads to make the purchases.

besides, the minute loading times aren't because it's caching all those animations and assets. That's a different division with different problems. Probably a mix of security checks, inefficient networking, and _maybe_ some choice in framework like Electron as a distant 3-5th (not that Teams uses Election).




We don't use Teams because it is fancy, or smooth or appealing.

We use Teams because the company that pays our salary tells us to use Teams. End of story.

And I would definitely trade opacity and fancy buttons for a client that loads and runs fast.


Unfortunately, you can't, because it isn't the opacity and fancy buttons making it slow in the first place. It's still a false dichotomy.


>Especially to more casual consumer or to business heads to make the purchases.

I covered that yes. Your company isn't made of people who will objectively measure the best product for the employees.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: