You lead the topic to a very big question. If you think here computer is not doing any interpretation, what you actually say is computer learning methods don't mean computer can think. In this article, scientists do make computer do some "interpretation" because the training data and test data are different. (NEW images and reconstruct).
People here have much more to do to fulfill the goal of "reconstructing high resolution, color image", but the problem is not computers do think or not.
People here have much more to do to fulfill the goal of "reconstructing high resolution, color image", but the problem is not computers do think or not.