Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
The Perl Foundation got $100,000 donation from the Craigslist Charitable Fund (perlfoundation.org)
100 points by yko on Jan 24, 2012 | hide | past | favorite | 23 comments



This is very nice. Between this and Booking.com's (disclaimer: I work there) 
€100,000 donation just over a month ago TPF is really getting on track for having large corporate sponsorship from organizations who recognize how valuable Perl is for their infrastructure.

I talked to some of the TPF people at Booking.com's donation event and they expressed desires to have more paid-for developers working on the Perl 5 core, and they're really gearing up as an organization for making that happen.

One thing of note for those unfamiliar with the Perl community: Notice how both of these big grants are earmarked for Perl 5 development, not Perl 6 development.

By now Perl 6 is viewed as best an interesting research project by organizations using Perl 5 in production.

I don't mean that as a comment to detract away from what the Perl 6 developers are doing, but to point out that it's a very different pattern than what's happening with the next generation of Python, Ruby, PHP etc. runtimes.

1. http://news.perlfoundation.org/2012/01/bookingcom-sponsors-1...


By now Perl 6 is viewed as best an interesting research project by organizations using Perl 5 in production.

As a member of an organization using Perl 5 (among many other languages), I should probably speak up. Though we haven't donated many thousands to TPF, it may be worth noting that with a minimal set of modules, similar stability and performance guarantee within an order of magnitude Perl 5's, we would be using Perl 6 without question. (With that alone it wouldn't replace all of our Perl 5 code, but we would be using more Perl overall as a result.) In fact Niecza is temptingly close to that status at the moment if you factor interop into the equation.

We have a highly polyglot environment, so introducing a new language to that is something that can be taken in stride. I assume a lot of Perl 6 reluctance comes from unfamiliarity, but for us it's more a matter of overall reliability. I find Perl 6 is better able to represent program logic, and I am sure having it in our environment would improve prototyping and maintenance considerably.


Here's the question I have.

Perl5 -> Perl6 is not a natural progression. It's such a radically different language that going to say Python or Ruby is nearly as similar a change. Why's it obvious to you guys?


We have some Python code kicking around, but it hasn't penetrated our codebase very much, and in fact has never made itself integral. We have one very small yet important tool that had an implementation in Python but it was eventually rewritten. While has always been a very important tool, it was never a service. We've never (to the best of my knowledge) had Python in any of our server code, it just hasn't come to pass.

As for Ruby, I think the closest we came was a Redmine install. I don't have enough experience with Ruby to pass any judgments, but to me it feels like a poor compromise between some other languages. I don't think I'd mind replacing our use of PHP with it but it would be a harder sell than I would be in for and it simply wouldn't be worth it, considering the value of homogeneity within the existing PHP projects (or alternatively, the cost of rewrites.) Besides, I see no reason to avoid Perl here, virtually all of the PHP is database driven... DBI is just phenomenal.

Even though we're willing to take on another language it still must be justified. I suppose I have to answer the real question now. My answer is: I don't know about 'progression' (there's certainly a discontinuity) but I think Perl 6 is a natural evolution of Perl—not specifically Perl 5, but a truly 100% organic product of Perl culture. It also has some specific enhancements that solve real problems I have identified in our code which wouldn't be possible without a break of some kind.


Perl 6 is still "Perlish", in the sense of TIMTOWTDI and DWIMmy-ness. However, after playing around with Perl 6 a little bit, I'm not convinced that it keeps Perl 5's practical simplicity.

I suspect that there's a whole crowd of Perl 5 lovers who just want something practical and simple -- they want a cleaned-up Perl 5 -- and they're scratching their heads wondering why the 6ers are spending so much time working on advanced features.


I believe the original plan was that you could run perl5 & perl6 together like so...

    use v6;
    .say for 1..10;
  
    {
      use v5;
      say for 1..10;
    }

    # back to perl6
That might (still) be a pipedream however one reality which is working right now is that you can run some perl5 modules from within Rakudo (Perl6 on Parrot):

    use v6;
    use CGI:from<perl5>;

    my $q = CGI.new;
    print $q.header,
        $q.start_html('Hello World'),
        $q.h1('Hello World'),
        $q.end_html;
ref: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2188433


Python, Ruby and PHP are converging so much it's becoming totally pointless to keep up with more than one of those, other than availability of tools and runtimes. Looking forward to production-ready Perl 6.


And community. I am using both PHP and Python because of two widely different communities and approaches to solve problems. For example, Python is the language with the largest and most robust collection of scientific software bindings. Python users tend to take a bit more time to implement things, but they do it in a very robust way. Java is pushing a bit, but Python stays the king.

On the other hand, for everything a little bit "web" related, you can find a stack load of easy to use PHP code. They are also usually "pure" PHP, making them easy to integrate in your own framework/system. Usually the PHP community at large is very fast at getting things done in a simple way (sometimes a bit ugly, but this is improving drastically).

Note: This is of course a bit of a caricature what I wrote, but in essence, you cannot ignore the community/ecosystem supporting your language.


I agree. It's partly what I meant by availability of tools. I actually didn't mean IDE (I'm a basic text editor / vi person), I meant codebase mostly, libraries and whatnot.


A few months ago there was this discussion on HN - Why is Funding Perl Core Development So Difficult? (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3247925).

Unfortunately Perl doesn't have a Sugar Daddy :( However it does have a few benevolent Uncles :)

Here's the breakdown of the last 12 months contributions...

  $10,000   Jun 2011  Vienna.pm
  $10,000   Jul 2011  Booking.com
  $10,000   Jul 2011  cPanel
  €100,000  Jan 2012  Booking.com
  $100,000  Jan 2012  Craigslist
ref: Figures by trawling TPF website. Hopefully I have this correct! http://news.perlfoundation.org/2011/06/viennapm-donates-up-t... | http://news.perlfoundation.org/2011/07/bookingcom-sponsor-p5... | http://news.perlfoundation.org/2011/07/cpanel-sponsor-p5cmf.... | http://news.perlfoundation.org/2012/01/bookingcom-sponsors-1... | http://news.perlfoundation.org/2012/01/craigslist-charitable...


Hard to find, unfortunately, but NET-A-PORTER (disclaimer: I work there) also donated $10,000. As well as LOVEFiLM, Oslo.pm, and Dijkmat donating various amounts. Source: http://www.perlfoundation.org/previous_homepage_news


That earlier discussion is part of what sparked this (craigslist) donation, FWIW. (I work there)


It's great to know something good came out of that discussion despite the silly trolling that blemished parts of it.


Booking.com contributed €100k, not $100k. €100k =~ $130k. So the total for the last 12 months is around $260k, not $230k.


Have amended.


And TPF can put the money to good use; recently (2010 or 2011, don't remember exactly) they started to pay one core developer (Dave Mitchell) to work on bug fixes and refactors that nobody else wanted to do. Later Nicholas Clark got a similar grant, and both have been used to great effect.

I'm not deeply invovled the p5 developers, but it doesn't look like these grant create envy in other contributors, judging from the development speed.


re: Dave Mitchel / core development - Yes it was 2010 on the back of a $50K grant from Booking.com in Dec 2008: http://news.perlfoundation.org/2011/12/grant-from-bookingcom...


I rather like this, especially the quote:

[Jim Buckmaster] added, "It was unclear at first how best to give something back to Perl. Fortunately there was more than one way to do it."


On a related topic, can someone recommend a good book for learning perl these days? I never learned it and think it is a good skill.


Depending on how adept you already are at programming:

1] Learning Perl (6th Edition) is excellent for beginners.

2] Modern Perl (2nd Edition was just published; free ebook version should be out by next week) assumes a basic knowledge of both programming in general and of Perl in particular, but is well-written and very clear.

3] Programming Perl (the 4th Edition covering Perl 5.14 will be a huge update from 3rd Edition (published in 2000 for Perl 5.6!); should be published in February, according to O'Reilly) is the famous Camel book and the ultimate Perl reference.

The Perl Cookbook is a little outdated now, although it's not too bad and there is talk on the mailing lists of updating it. But it's not really aimed at learning Perl though.

As already mentioned, PerlMonks is also a great website to browse.


Thanks for the tips! Will get the modern perl book and the new camel book when the new edition is published!

=)


I'm fond of the "Modern Perl" book, but you should have programming background for that. You won't go wrong by buying brian d foy's books either.

(Best is probably to ask at PerlMonks.org what to read.)

Edit: My best advice for a newbie is to get the Cookbook after the first basics. The Perl one is really helpful.


That is my idea. Thanks! =)




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: