Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'll go against the grain here and hard-disagree.

My Canon has locked up hard only once in half a decade of hard use, generating ~8TB of images in adverse conditions. It is sometimes left turned on for months at a time. I sometimes accidentally do terrible things with the power switch and SD card. Lenses are attached/removed without a care in the world. I've never seen a flaw in the function of menus or the corruption of a single image.

I cannot state the same for almost any other software product. I can use it like a tool, not like a computer. That's a sign of good software.



Aren't all the things you described signs of good hardware?


It's both. If pro cameras (or even point and shoot) had really bad software, we would see corrupted files all the time, unreadable media, exposure completely off, weird bugs in battery monitoring or power consumption, etc.

Smartphones have constant "updates" and yearly new OSes, and we think it's marvelous if a two year old phone still functions. Yet digital cameras from 15 years ago still work fine with exactly zero update.

Robustness and dependability are important features. In-the-box HDR is cute but it matters less.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: