Isn’t this because a training set usually consists 99% of implied things? Afaik, these never provide a full description like “…, also two hands, two legs, three fingers, arms not bent, adequately long limbs, leg asymmetry, cartoon physics, …”, and also never feed examples of a wrong geometry/biology/etc.
I’m no NN guy, but to me all it seems as basically underconstrained and unrelated to “understanding”. It’s like these e.g. woodwork, magic trick, dancing, guitar, etc teachers who fail to message a way to do something and can only tell “look”, then just do it, ask you to repeat, and get annoyed when you fail again.
I’m no NN guy, but to me all it seems as basically underconstrained and unrelated to “understanding”. It’s like these e.g. woodwork, magic trick, dancing, guitar, etc teachers who fail to message a way to do something and can only tell “look”, then just do it, ask you to repeat, and get annoyed when you fail again.