Yishan's points are great, but there is a more general and fundamental question to discuss...
Moderation is the act removing content. i.e. of assigning a score of 1 or 0 to content.
If we generalize, we can assign a score from 1 to 0 to all content. Perhaps this score is personalized. Now we have a user's priority feed.
How should Twitter score content using personalization? Filter bubble? Expose people to a diversity of opinions? etc. Moderation is just a special case of this.
Some people want to escape the filter bubble, to expose their ideas to criticism, to strengthen their thinking and arguments through conflict.
Other people want a community of like-minded people to share and improve ideas and actions collectively, without trolls burning everything down all the time.
Some people want each of those types of community depending on the topic and depending on their mood at the time.
A better platform would let each community decide, and make it easy to fork off new communities with different rules when a subgroup or individual decides the existing rules aren't working for them.
Moderation is the act removing content. i.e. of assigning a score of 1 or 0 to content.
If we generalize, we can assign a score from 1 to 0 to all content. Perhaps this score is personalized. Now we have a user's priority feed.
How should Twitter score content using personalization? Filter bubble? Expose people to a diversity of opinions? etc. Moderation is just a special case of this.