Boeing is exactly the type of company that would engage their army of lawyers and relations in the Justice Department to put a "nuisance" behind bars.
Someone who endangers the holy profit for something measly as flight safety is a prime target for companies like Boeing, Nestlé and all the other fundamentally evil corporations out there. The pretty detailed Wirecard documentaries and books out there are a useful perspective into the world of these corrupt people.
I'm not denying that Boeing is a company that behaves badly, at all. The senate report into the 747-Max shows that they actively manipulated testing conditions, and pressured engineers, so that they could get certification when they knew the plane could be unsafe. Which is unforgivable, and should constitute a whole heap of crimes.
However, that a large aeronautics company would hound a known schizophrenic when it's much cheaper to dismiss them as nuts (and extremely easy to paint them as such), is another thing entirely. And when you're acting out because your symptoms are flaring, you are very likely to become a public nuisance.
Without a single scrap of evidence for one, and some for the other, the statistical likelihood lies in one direction, and not the other.
If he had an episode in McDonalds it is against the ADA to arrest him. He was painted off as a lunatic to discredit him. It is like arresting a diabetic for insulin shock and calling them drunk.
Someone who endangers the holy profit for something measly as flight safety is a prime target for companies like Boeing, Nestlé and all the other fundamentally evil corporations out there. The pretty detailed Wirecard documentaries and books out there are a useful perspective into the world of these corrupt people.