> Generally, founders are more successful leaders of their own companies.
Is that just because bad companies remove their founders in a last ditch effort to survive? Is that because bad founders can screw the company before they are removed?
Founders are the ones with the experience, skills, and knowledge to lead the companies they create.
Generally, VCs are equity portfolio managers and not qualified to lead a company. Even when they are successful founders themselves, they're almost never the right people to lead another founder's startup.
Is that just because bad companies remove their founders in a last ditch effort to survive? Is that because bad founders can screw the company before they are removed?