> Update: Virginia Girl Recants Story of Assault ...
What significance do you see here?
> NY Times title after an islamic terrorist beheaded a teacher near Paris
Again, what is the significance to you? It's not that I can't guess at some of it, but to discuss it I need to know what you think.
> (interpretations of Trump and Biden motives)
Trump and Biden are different people with different motives; should they report those motives are the same? Trump brazenly pushed those motives into the public, as an attempt at cultural change and attack on his opponents. Biden seems open about his too.
Also, according to the article, Trump backed his statement with lies, as he often did; should they be reported as facts? Should that be ignored?
Finally, circumstances had changed. The murder was years ago, for example.
> Ahmad Al Alawi Alissa killed 10 people in Boulder, Colorado, the shooter is referred to as a "gunman whose motives remain a mystery"
Do you know the motives? Was there evidence of them at the time?
> "How White Women Use Themselves as Instruments of Terror"
That's an opinion piece, which is very different. You can find all sorts of agendas and biases in NY Times opinions, the entire spectrum (almost).
.....
My impression, very possibly false, is you want the NYT to assume and appease the propaganda of neo-reactionaryism (or a segment of it): anti-immigrant and religious prejudices, and the unsubtle propaganda of 'anti-white racism'. Not only are those evil, dangerous and ugly, they are baseless. Certainly they don't belong in journalism, and you won't find them in anything serious from any source.
I pointed out (exaggerating only modestly) the absurd amount of benefit of the doubt you're giving the NY Times. If you believe that's an insult, I really can't help you.
