So ... how about some self-reflection in your bubble of self-righteousness? And actually answer to the answer of jacquesm?

"But it wasn't a question, it was a statement, and a faulty one at that

Best case interpretation would require substituting 'current' for 'frequency' and even then it would be inaccurate because the current is a proxy for the Z-distance to the tip which is then used to convert to a 3D map, which in turn can be visualized. "

So it seems you were just wrong in your statement and therefore downvoted.

In general, I would agree that the downvoting habit here is sometimes over the line. Like I would not have downvoted your original question, even though it did contained a false statement. But how you react to an answer actually explaining the reasoning - does not speak for you in this case.