Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It might not be true now because LLVM and GCC can generally put a commercial compiler 6 feet under, but if you're paying for a compiler you'd definitely want to choose the one that delivers the best performance (Money being no object)

No idea whether ICC is still worth paying for




No idea whether ICC is still worth paying for

From my experience, ICC is far more reluctant to exploit UB, yet still generates very good code.


ICC exploits the standard itself: it generates code that is technically incorrect.


What do you mean?


As Patrick mentions, ICC generates code that doesn't follow IEEE-754: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20437375 (I should have mentioned I was talking about that rather than the C standard).


Oh I see, you're talking about floating point.

So basically ICC has -ffast-math (or -funsafe-math-optimizations) on by default, and you can turn it off with an explicit flag?

I see this as more of a philosophical difference than a material one since you can just add or remove the flag on either one...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: