> The first article is literally titled "Is Criticism Of Billionaire Elizabeth Holmes Sexist? Yes & No", implying at the least that some criticism is sexist
If you read the article, you would have seen that criticism of how she ran the company is not sexist. Criticism that incidentally says sexist things is.
> The story would have played out differently if she were a man.
Holmes isn't a journalist and has made many fraudulent claims. This doesn't support your claim.
> Elizabeth Holmes is a great example of maybe why the women are so frustrated. She is a woman entrepreneur who built a fabulous company, did great things for consumers and she got attacked,"
Again, this quote is from a Theranos investor, who has also made many fraudulent statements, not a journalist.
I note with interest how you don't justify your other links at all, which don't even obliquely support your claim.
If you read the article, you would have seen that criticism of how she ran the company is not sexist. Criticism that incidentally says sexist things is.
> The story would have played out differently if she were a man.
Holmes isn't a journalist and has made many fraudulent claims. This doesn't support your claim.
> Elizabeth Holmes is a great example of maybe why the women are so frustrated. She is a woman entrepreneur who built a fabulous company, did great things for consumers and she got attacked,"
Again, this quote is from a Theranos investor, who has also made many fraudulent statements, not a journalist.
I note with interest how you don't justify your other links at all, which don't even obliquely support your claim.