Well, there is still the possibility of removal, it should just kind of be all or nothing.
>I could write the equal and opposite rant that you'd be absolutely mad to invest money in a company that you don't control.
It's hard to reply to a hypothetical rant, but I've imagined one (I think charitably) -- can you then further imagine, if I wrote a reply, that you'd be mad to invest in a CEO who was a pushover, that you could just push around and get to do whatever? Because if you can push them around, how about people whose interests aren't even as strongly aligned as yours and theirs? Therefore anyone you can control, you'd be mad to invest in. J:D
>I could write the equal and opposite rant that you'd be absolutely mad to invest money in a company that you don't control.
It's hard to reply to a hypothetical rant, but I've imagined one (I think charitably) -- can you then further imagine, if I wrote a reply, that you'd be mad to invest in a CEO who was a pushover, that you could just push around and get to do whatever? Because if you can push them around, how about people whose interests aren't even as strongly aligned as yours and theirs? Therefore anyone you can control, you'd be mad to invest in. J:D