Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It makes sense. Continuing in Tesla's footsteps was doomed to failure. You end up wasting 90% or more energy being transmitted. And it significantly raises noise floor for 'power'. This just seems like a bad ideal all around, so no surprise they're "pivoting".

A way this could have worked, is if it could tell where the charging devices were, and then beam-form in that direction. Then you'd be limited to by how many beams you could initiate.




Also you'd get energy beams being fired around your living space. Seems a bit iffy to me that you could do this without frying random things, biological and otherwise.


“Please remove all iron from your house before activating the device”.


There actually is another company doing something similar to that called Wi-Charge, except they use an IR laser beam. It's still got quite a few fundamental physical limitations on safety and efficiency, but it's more practical than uBeam at least.

Dave Jones also did a video on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bXjn3wwM8o




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: