Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I would prefer opt-in.



Fair point, although I suspect the counterargument centers around the reduction in participation in an opt-in system.

I wonder if something like a global "privacy" toggle could work -- a way to indicate what your own personal preferences for default behavior are. Apps would default sensitive features to the global toggle, while allowing specific overrides in either direction.


> Fair point, although I suspect the counterargument centers around the reduction in participation in an opt-in system.

That's not a counter-argument, that's whining that you can't have everything you want without deceptive practices.


Of course the argument is reduction in participation... but that's fine. People should not be default-assumed to want to be stalked by Google. They should be prohibited from doing so, and be forced, like every other business, to seek informed interest in their product.


Then every time you:

    1. Install something
    2. Uninstall something
    3. Open Chrome
    4. Open Any other Google App
    5. Turn GPS on
    6. Turn GPS off
expect a nag requesting permission to track you. See, now, to get the nags to go away, you gave up your rights. But you know, you "gave permission"...


Isn't it already opt-in? iirc you're always presented a screen asking you if you want to enable location history.


I think (s)he's right in pointing out that while location services as a whole has an initial prompt (I believe the default value is on, but you do have an opportunity to change it), the individual features in e.g. maps are default opt-in after install (and you have to navigate settings to turn them off).




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: