Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No such thing as an acceptable ad.



Then pay for content.

Ads are how people who provide free content make money. Yes, they are often offensive (visually, not necessarily the content), slow to load, and contain or utilize some of tracker or retargeting mechanism. But if you can remove those and you basically just have a PNG telling you about a product or service, that is the very definition of acceptable.

But to freely consume content from someone (whether a single blogger or a massive company) then bitch about unobtrusive, nontracking, inoffensive advertisements is a pretty good example of entitlement.


I do actually pay for content. And I do so gladly.

But the fundamental problem with ads is that, even when they are unobstrusive, don't invade my privacy and don't compromise my security, they still are inherently manipulative and therefore unethical. The Internet was designed to exchange information. How I then choose to display that information is up to me. Ad-based businesses are tolerated, but have no claim to the internet. I will continue to block every ad I can and businesses will have to adapt, or die. I won't shed a tear for them.


If you don't like ads on a site, don't visit the site. Content creators need money.

How are ads manipulative?

What does "claim to the internet" mean? The internet isn't a piece of land.


It's not my responsibility to avoid visiting websites that have ads on them. If ad-supported businesses don't want me to read their content, they shouldn't send it to me.


> Then pay for content.

Hehe, I guess that's why one would use an ad blocker, right?

I hear you, but this isn't about helping sites survive, it's about ads in an ad blocker that is keeping their money for themselves, and is used mostly by people who dislike ads.


I'll decide what code runs on my system thank you. At this point ad blocking is part of a defence in depth against malware.


Spam is defined as content the receiver is not interested in (turns out some people really do want cheap viagra), acceptable ads can then be said to be the person viewing them considers acceptable. By that token there maybe no ads op considers acceptable.


I blanket block every ad (or whatever the list currently has). If a site has ads, I'll manually block those too. I'll go into their code and find their ad service url and add it into my list. I'll do whatever it takes to remove them, regardless if its simple or not. I do not want to see them and I will continue to visit those sites. I just wish a good adblocker would come to mobile because I'd use it there as well.


>I just wish a good adblocker would come to mobile because I'd use it there as well.

That's been done for a long time: uBlock Origin for Firefox has been around for ages, and Firefox has had an Android version for quite some time.


I only ever used chrome, never thought about using a different browser on android.


Firefox on Android. Install ublock origin.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: