People not only have forgotten what "open source" means, some are also violently opposed to being told it means something other than whatever personal definition of it they have. :-)
And this is why I keep repeating the same thing. Because people have forgotten that open source also means it must have the freedom redistribute. It is point 1:
And we have also forgotten that open source was a term coined in 1998 (as mentioned by rms in the interview) by the Open Source Initiative and was intended to be a synonym for free software that de-emphasised the freedom part: