I've received legal advice to take care not to discover patents. Because if we knew of the existence of a patent then it could be shown that we were knowingly infringing on the patent.
I wonder if trademark law has similar incentives to behave irrationally.
First, the Court’s references to “willful misconduct” do
not mean that a court may award enhanced damages
simply because the evidence shows that the infringer
knew about the patent and nothing more.
Second, also note:
“failure of an infringer to obtain the
advice of counsel . . . may not be used to prove that the
accused infringer wilfully infringed.”
I wonder if trademark law has similar incentives to behave irrationally.