Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

1. They probably don't need sharding, since the dataset is small enough to just replicate it in mirrors.

2. 1ms is achievable with SSDs, but 200K q/minute seems slow my gut feeling tells me.

This post is more like "ha we don't need NoSQL for this special use case" - Once you need scaling and some sort of atomics, you quickly have to use HBase for row-level atomicity and scaling.

Redis is probably better suited for the posted usecase anyway.




Why HBase? why not just shard your keys?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: