Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xiaomei's commentslogin

This is what I thought. I'm surprised Squadmail (link in opening post) has posted their product more than once on HN and has gotten nearly no comments or upvotes.


I believe Amazon Payments allows for sub-dollar charges.


Can you guess where one needs to be located to use Amazon Payments?


The Stripe minimum charge is currently $0.50.


According to their pricing at 2.9% + 30c per charge that leaves you with 18.55c. Paypal is 5% + $0.05, a massive 47.45c. If Stripe could even partially match that I'd be delighted. I'm currently looking into Amazon's aggregated option and haven't come up with numbers yet.


One point: the Paypal micropayments tariff level makes sense for stuff under about $12 or thereabouts. For prices above that, it is actually worse.

But yes, Stripe matching the micropayments levels would be kinda neat.


You are allowed to have two accounts (this is even officially recommended by PayPal), one with micropayments and the other with normal payments; as you know the amount of money being requested before transferring the user to PayPal, you can use the two accounts to get the best possible rate in all cases.


You could sell the site on http://flippa.com


Imagine:

You have a growing successful website and you wonder what to do with it, would your answer be: I should sell it on flippa?

I think this is a poor advice, especially in an entrepreneur community.


Matt, co-founder of Flippa here.

Given the huge size of fandalism, Phil would probably be better of hiring an investment banker or business broker to sell the it (not that it's his goal here)... Flippa's specialty is under $250K, once you start approaching 7-figures, the transaction gets more complex, the buyers get bigger, and it makes sense to have a professional involved.


It may be poor advice but it is an option nevertheless. pud asked for what to do next and selling the site is a potential road to take. I'm disappointed that some people have down voted this to death. I am following the rules of the site. I feel bullied after expressing an opinion.


I think you're right, but I guess some people thought your comment didn't add to the discussion.

It did answer the original question. I wouldn't have downvoted it, but I wouldn't have upvoted it either.

That said, I do believe it's not the best suggestion (especially since pud seems engaged and interested in growing the site).


You are right. You were not off-topic and the fact it is poor advice is only a judgement, not the absolute truth.

Maybe I have misused downvoting here. Can't downvoting be used to express disagreement instead of just reporting a misbehaviour?


I believe downvoting is only available to users with high karma. This makes me believe that downvoting is meant to fight misbehavior. Unfortunately there is no way to report misbehavior of downvoting. If you already have high karma you have a conflict of interest in reporting downvoting misbehavior.


Actually, it seems that downvoting for disagreement is a ok behaviour:

pg: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=117171


I will stop using downvotes for disagreement then.

(Actually I think it is the first time I use this downvote feature on HN so the damage is fairly limited so far).


I believe a taboo has slowly been growing among the entrepreneur community regarding selling startup businesses. I think it started with Mark Z. turning down offers from major tech players and it has continued with Dropbox turning down an acquisition from Apple.

I am not taking sides on whether entrepreneurs should sell their companies. But I think there is a problem when bringing up the subject is frowned upon on. I am unsure whether this is a problem with Hacker News' moderation system or it really is a taboo.


I wonder why Netflix doesn't match users with similar movie preferences. Perhaps is a legal restriction.


I thought it was closely related to staying within the boundaries of VPAA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Privacy_Protection_Act


Right but if you were matched against other anonymous users with similar likes, it would be legal


In their recent blog entry they say that it is, but in other countries you can sync up with your friends. In the US you can share rss feeds of what you have watched and me and my friends use that.


Netflix used to have friends features in the US too, you could see what they'd watched, and take quizzes where you guessed what movies they liked. It was pretty fun.



This could be extended by adding file upload support. What impact would this have under a SOPA-world?


I wonder why Facebook did not consider listing at BATS. They have a better hacker culture than Nasdaq and NYSE.


I am building a solution which tries to solve the audience problem you refer to. Let me know if you are interested in becoming an early user.



http://www.phaxio.com

Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with Phaxio.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: