Since weeks I have the opposite problem that outlook.com does not seem to detect spam at all anymore. Getting a dozen obvious spam emails a day right in my inbox

For me it suggested fictional book names that do not exist

Looks pretty cool but it also faces some issues with hallucinating. For example asking the chat for the you.com api docs will returned an invalid url returning a 404 for me

Ridiculous. Now you can’t even mention other websites exist?Time to post mastodon links on purpose to get it over with

This is beyond ridiculous. Twitter has given me so much over the years and it’s dismantled in days

Twitter is great, but its the users that provide the value, not Twitter itself. If all the interesting people are moving to Mastodon, guess I'll need to move as well.

Same. It's sad how quickly this is getting absurd.

It's allowed to be annoyed about it.

Individuals in societies have this thing called reputation. Him claiming to supportive of free speech while doing this to a social platform he now owns is pure hypocrisy and damages his reputation, whatever's left of it.

The Sourcegraph Editor is a fork of vscode? Is it not possible to implement it with an extension? Happily would install an extension but i'm not sure whether i would switch the editor

Sourcegraph CEO here. The Sourcegraph Editor features (on https://about.sourcegraph.com/products/editor, plus other things on the roadmap that aren't on that page) are currently not possible to build as an extension.

One of two things will happen, assuming we build a great product (which is obviously our intent :):

1. We will prove that these features are valuable, and VS Code and other editors will eventually add support (or extensibility) for them. Then we could just ship extensions. Everyone wins. And our customers and business do well because we have a great server product for companies needing to scale up code intelligence and code reviews beyond what can run locally—the backend for all these editors that now support these new code intelligence and review features.

2. We'll prove these features are valuable, but other editors don't add them (or the extensibility to support them). Then we'll continue shipping a first-class standalone editor with support for these features, and developers who need these features will use that editor. The world will have one additional editor. For developers that don't use that editor, we'll build lightweight extensions for other editors with some of the functionality (and that make it easy to jump to our app from other editors).

I don't know which will come true, but I do know that either way, we as a company need to demonstrate that these things are valuable to developers in their editor. That's what we're focused on now. :)

This is good, I do not want this as a VSCode extension because I do not use VSCode. If you could build it right into Jetbrains, though... maybe.

I would be concerned about how it would integrate and would probably still prefer a separate application instead of a docked or pull-out frame.

What are your thoughts on editor preferences for developers? If a company wanted to adopt Sourcegraph wouldn't they need to force all their devs to use the Sourcegraph editor? What if half of the team used Jetbrains and the other half VS Code?

We were worried about this initially, too. It turns out that the features are valuable enough that developers are willing to use Sourcegraph as a separate search and review tool even if they don't use it as their main editor. So you can use IntelliJ for day-to-day editing and Sourcegraph for code review and search.

Perhaps we should make that explicit: "Whether you use it as your primary editor or just for searching and reviewing code, ..."

Thanks for the reply. The form factor for code-review and commenting were standout features for me and i'll definitely check out the process.

Also, you can set up Sourcegraph Server (https://about.sourcegraph.com/products/server) and then everyone gets the core features on all your company's code in their web browser.

They are using the Monaco editor component of VSCode, not forking it

(Sourcegraph dev here) Just to be clear, the Sourcegraph Editor is built on top of Visual Studio Code, not just Monaco. Although we did use just Monaco on the website (not editor) in the past. :)

This seems really great on the first look, but uploading the code is a real issue. It is basically a keylogger

ohmyzsh seems to be not vulerable, but the powerlevel9k theme is

The problem is there is no really alternative. Or what alternatives exist to write good looking, cross platform desktop applications with reasonable effort? I don't think there really is one. Another think is the huge amount of dependencies typical electron apps have (or in general node applications). 500-1000 packages is not unusual. Thats ridiculous for a simple desktop application

If there is one distro i have to recommend it's Solus. I'm usually not a fan of new distro xyz were not much except the wallpaper changed. But Solus is build from scratch and questions many old linux dogmas. It also focuses on the desktop and is probably one of the fastest distros with a great OOTB experience. It also has a very high velocity were every time you look there are new amazing improvements