This seems to be an issue in the PaaS space. The guy who runs CapRover illegally changed the license on it to be nonfree, without copyright assignments from any of the contributors who worked on it when it was free software.
It’s deceptive, because it starts out saying APACHE LICENSE but then adds a bunch of nonfree provisions to it, making it NOT Apache licensed.
It’s especially galling when all of these people are trying to nickel and dime their users with this open core nonsense while their business wouldn’t exist if not for docker, k8s, postgres, mysql, node, php, all being open source.
I wonder how good it would be to convert sheet music to MusicXML. All the current tools more or less suck with this task, or maybe I’m just ignorant and don’t know what lego bricks to put together.
I was a Nexus/Pixel user for 10+ years. Majority of the phones I owned during that time had some quirks or issues. The worst examples were Nexus 5X and Pixel 5 – both just suddenly froze one day, shut down, and never turned back on again. After that Pixel 5 surprise I grudgingly switched to iPhone 12 mini.
I still think Google’s Android UI is the best one out there for me, and I despise a lot in the iPhone UX (such as the keyboard) but I just need a phone that works and I can get repaired or replaced easily if I need to. At least in Finland, Google’s customer service has been abysmal over the years.
Almost certainly a lot of the people saying they are ”crossing” their eyes are actually ”uncrossing” their eyes; focusing the eyes straighter than what would normally happen on the surface where the image is laid out.
This is also how the legendary ”Magic Eye” books were supposed to be viewed. Not by crossing the eyes.
The bigger the codebase, we all eventually find ourselves in scenarios where we were the idiot. Making the APIs as foolproof as possible, utilizing tools like Semgrep, deprecating stuff in the way your language supports that it shows up in the IDE,… all that stuff should be utilized.
I think the maker of this had a point and I was curious what the crowd here thought about that. I think most people didn’t look further into his argument nor the linked YouTube video, where the idea was that you’d accompany these with darker/lighter variants (depending on dark vs light mode).
While I generally agree with this particular site, it would have been nice if whoever made this put some better thought into making the light mode colors even remotely aesthetically pleasing. Supported by the other complaints in this thread it is currently completely self-defeating.
I scrolled through hue in both modes and didn’t find a position that I could call presentable. Some are not the worst, but that’s it. I believe it can be done with 4 base colors, but this site doesn’t follow well-known color scheming principles.
