Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hindsightbias's comments login

Consider a Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs applied to an AGI.

I predict weird nuclear and space proposals in the next few years.


Why are we subsizing Apple when they have $200B in cash laying around?

Repatriate and give them sme tax credit.


Why would Apple repatriate their cash and pay any taxes?

I don’t understand why they would care to move the money out of the countries where they earned that money and are likely to be expanding more than they are in the U.S. anyways.


Cause the us is no save haven for money and ownership anymore? Look at other autocracies where the dictators give and take the riches ala russia.In a oligarchy with king, you are one bad emperor day at court away from loosing it.


You mean Ireland?


A lot of subsidization is tax credits.


When even your secret programs have to do marketing. Don’t cancel me bro!


In the book Skunk Works, Ben Rich laments that Lockheed was often passed over for contracts and missions because their achievements were so classified that the various branches of the military didn't know that things like stealth technology were possible, let alone already in production. Sometimes weren't even invited to bid on projects to develop technology that they'd already developed.

Marketing of secret projects is a tricky business!


Was it Lockheed who simply ran a regular marketing campaign for NGAD and then later scrubbed references to it


That's exactly what I was thinking too. With all the chainsaws on display and rumors of deep cuts, makes sense for them to explain a bit to regulars about why they exist and how well things are going.


one would be excused to think you made this account just for the sake of aptronym and comment, but alas, 3k+ karma


In fairness, it's an insightful comment. The behavior of plenty of agencies is likely to be erratic or at the very least novel in the current climate.


> That item says DOGE canceled a contract of almost $8 billion with D&G Support Services for services provided to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Investigative reporting from the New York Times revealed that the contract was valued at only $8 million.

I guess it's better these geniuses aren't working on FSD.


The first rule of opposition should be to not embrace the conspiracy memes of your opponents.


Sykes-Picot agreements weren't just for your great grandparents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes–Picot_Agreement


People are finally getting acclimated to the crash rates we were used to back in the old days.


I’ll bet DOGE could code up an auction system in no time. Or turn it over to Ticketmaster. Think of the profits.


Or just open it up to the entire Internet [1].

[1] https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/the-doge-website-is-s...


You say that, but a private company already manages the reservation system, and profits off of all the junk fees


Shhh, don't let the facts get in the way of the bootlicking.


But what if we had LexisNexis run it and charge a $350 processing fee for entrance passes with a 3-8 business week processing time?


This is usually doable until it's DEWS/SAGE radar code from the 50's. That's what NASA started with and the last guy died in the 90s. We got every other subsystem off the mainframe, but had to keep it around for the radar stuff until 2004 or so.


I sense an interesting story.

Details please ;-)


https://www.baen.com/rip_moc

1990: https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/Documents/MCC%20Development%2...

Pirates: https://www.wbs.ac.uk/news/the-nasa-pirates-that-transformed...

Head Pirate: https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/hist...

WEX/Display builder/etc: Even when I was there my young peers weren't too keen on legacy/back-end understanding. GUIs were the cool thing. I worked on something that touched many legacy subsystems so got to work with a lot of "dinosaurs" (what the Pirates called them).

MCC testing was all AM shift, pirates/youts up front, retired controllers in the back. Test MOC took 30 minutes to recycle. I always sat in back if they'd let me.


They have to orbit ~1600 Kupiers by summer 2026 per their FCC license.

I’m sure President Musks FCC director will be ameanable.


Having to do it according to the terms of their license doesn't make it a realistic goal. Three or four launches by 2026 would be more in line with the traditional pace of new launchers (and this doesn't account for Blue Origin's uniquely slow pace.)


Get your facts right. That’s Amazon, not Blue Origin. Amazon has booked flight with various launch providers, including SpaceX to meet their license’s requirement. It’s still a very aggressive schedule with little room for error.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: