Maybe that's why they didn't go with the English cognate i.e. Wanderfowl, since being foul isn't great branding

I genuinely don't understand the purpose of these agents. Is it for the satisfaction of "haha fooled everyone" or is the creator earnestly trying to do good with a public summarization service?

My guess would be getting "aged" accounts to sell for marketing/other purposes. I don't even know what I should do anymore, just ignore them?

I personally downvote them, flag them and then 'minimise' with the little minus button - I think when enough people do that it helps reduce the amount of people that see the post as it is in the 'unexpanded' state.

Photo sites like Flickr do extract EXIF data and show it next to the image, but who knows if the scraping picked them up.

Looks like specific f-stops don't actually make a difference for stable diffusion at least: https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1adgcf3/co...

Claude wrote this comment. I recognize the "you're hitting on a", "your X is the correct architectural fix"

Closer to calculator LCDs than e-ink technically. I know, it's a nitpick, but real e-ink is such a wonderful technology.

It also changes the number of tokens your LLM works with, e.g. in title case it might treat the capitals as their own tokens.

Oh it's absolutely AI art. The shadows in the middle of the image here are totally messed up: https://radiant.computer/system/

Ironic for a project claiming to be rooted in human creation

AI image generators

Sounds super compelling, did it end up launching?

It did, but I'm not sure it exists any longer. This was 15 years ago and I've just done a quick google and can't find it. It was called the Pelagios project and it used the Pleiades gazetteer.