Several years ago, I launched 70 Million Jobs a YC company that was the first employment platform for people with records. Our launch announcement was, at the time, one of the most popular on HN.
At first, human resource departments thought I was nuts, but eventually they came around, and we turned profitable. Unfortunately, our timing wasn't so good because that coincided with the onset of Covid, when companies laid off tens of millions of workers.I tried holding out, but it took years to normalize. I had no choice but to shut down. That announcement (and the support it engendered also was enormous.)
I've continued with this work, and now am helping run a very similar staffing company, a division of a much larger business, 2C Workforce Solutions (2CCareers.com). I'll get to the point:
If you or anyone you know are in need of workers anywhere in the US, we can help. Studies have shown that those with records "are as good as--if not better than--those with no records." As a staffing company, we remain their employer and handle all the paperwork, payroll, taxes, etc. And of course, there's the very important social good being done.
If you've got (or can connect me to) a company that's got at least 100 employees, I'd very much appreciate the opportunity to connect. And for all of the incredible support, enthusiasm and great ideas in the past, thanks HN community!
lol. No, not anymore a millionaire YC founder and no real estate in my immediate future. But sure, love to chat. Please contact me at Richard@70millionjobs.com
Richard
A startup would be great, or one a bit more mature (b/c round)
Doesn't have to be a start-up, but I'd much prefer a company that has a strong social mission.
Right fit can mean a lot, I recognize, but it includes the nature of my role (I've run large companies), how well-funded, connection w/current leadership, etc. I only mentioned fit to explain that while I have several offers, the right one has yet to emerge. Thanks for asking.
No, Kranar-the 70 million does not include unpaid parking tickets, unless it escalates to a criminal case (which rarely happens). The explosion in these numbers occurred during our war on drugs in the 80's and 90's, along with "three strikes" laws.
The 70 million number relates to the number of people who have, in their record, an event(s) that might stand in their way from a variety of opportunities, so they are, by definition, serious events.
Failure to pay a parking ticket by the due date or failure to appear in court to contest a traffic ticket can result in a bench warrant for your arrest which results in a criminal record. Also, in many jurisdictions if you do not appear for a petty misdemeanor traffic ticket, you can be found guilty for failure to appear which also results in a criminal record.
No you will not go to prison over it but if you are subsequently pulled over, you can be arrested for your unpaid traffic ticket and held in jail until a court has a hearing on your case (and it goes without saying this will result in a criminal record).
I never disputed or argued anything about whether having a criminal record impedes ones ability to get a job. I replied to someone who was shocked that 70 million Americans have a criminal record and want to point out that it does not mean that 70 million Americans are criminals, or have been convicted of a crime. The vast majority of those records are strictly for arrests, most of which did not result in a conviction and could be the result of something as benign as having an unpaid parking ticket, which is a verifiable fact.
OP's reply is that parking tickets rarely result in arrest warrants or jail time. I could not find data for the U.S. as a whole, but at least in Texas over 1 million arrest warrants were issued in 2018 alone just over unpaid traffic tickets to the point that the legislature had to step in to request judges stop putting people in jail over it:
You can find similar articles about other states (this seems to be a mostly state by state).
For further information about how the 70 million people have criminal records gives a misleading impression, there's the following Politifact article as well:
I don't think the linked Politifact article supports your point:
> The FBI considers anyone who has been arrested on a felony charge to have a criminal record, even if the arrest did not lead to a conviction. The FBI only counts those with a misdemeanor if a state agency asks the bureau to keep it on file.
> So by the FBI’s standard, 73.5 million people in the United States had a criminal record as of June 30[, 2017].
The arrest warrants you mention from Texas would only count if failure to pay a parking ticket is a felony in TX
Then you fail to understand what is a fairly basic point, which is that most people misinterpret the meaning of a criminal record and think that 70 million people in the U.S. were at some point criminals, when in fact a criminal record can be issued simply for an arrest (even if you turn out to be innocent), as well as benign matters such as an unpaid parking ticket.
The FBI might not keep track of unpaid parking tickets in Texas as part of their own criminal record database, but Texas does keep unpaid parking tickets on record for their own criminal background check:
As that site points out, any arrest or warrant for arrest even for a misdemeanor will be recorded in a criminal background check.
Different government agencies have different standards for what goes into a criminal record so that there is no such thing as one single unambiguous definition for what a criminal record is. Consequently most people, including hiring managers, or people on Hacker News shocked that 70 million people have such a record, may misinterpret what a criminal record means, what the implications of one are and how serious having one is.
There is no harm in pointing out to people that a criminal record, in and of itself, does not mean that someone is guilty of a criminal offense or even that they're guilty of something serious. It could be something benign like an unpaid parking ticket or someone was arrested who turned out to be entirely innocent.
The 70 million number (the one you were specifically nitpicking) comes from the FBI database, not from a union of state level databases. So that's 70 million people who have been convicted of or arrested on a felony charge, or had a state explicitly ask the FBI to retain a record of their misdemeanor arrest, per your source.
OP was clear in this thread that "criminal record" wasn't synonymous with "has been to prison." This point was also explained to me explicitly during all the pre-employment background checks I have had.
Still, one American out of three has been once arrested??? From my entire circle I only know of one person which almost got arrested, but true I'm not in the USA...
Having (or having had) an outstanding bench warrant for your arrest sounds like the kind of thing that could really mess up your employment prospects, though!
I'm really not sure what you're trying to dispute. It seems like you and OP agree that there are many ways that someone can get themselves a criminal record and that a record shouldn't be a lifelong burden that prevents you from getting a decent job.
My original post was not in response to OP but to someone who is shocked that 70 million people have a criminal record, because most people when asked assume that a criminal record means some kind of conviction, it does not.
It was OP who decided to dispute me and argue that unpaid parking tickets are unlikely to result in an arrest or a criminal matter. I replied pointing out with sources that his claim is wrong. A surprising number of people are in jail over unpaid parking tickets and in Texas in one year alone over 1 million unpaid tickets became a criminal matter resulting in jail time.
I agree that OP seems to argue against this is bizzare since even a record for unpaid traffic offenses can needlessly disqualify someone from a job, but I am not OP and all I really care to do is point out the facts.
I am, in fact, considering doing it again, but differently/better. However, as you may know, this path is arduous, and after launching 4 major startups, my bones grow weary.
Your experience notwithstanding, the data tell a very different story: in fact, those with records almost never get into trouble on the job. How do I know this?
1. There exists a federal bonding program that indemnifies companies that hire convicted felons when they're released. Over the course of more than 3 decades, fewer than 2 cases are filed annually.
2. SHRM (the Society for Human Resource Management, of which I am the Fair Chance Hiring Partner) conducts an annual survey with the Koch Foundation. Year after year they report that ~80% of all hiring managers believe the quality of hiring when hiring someone with a record is "as good as if not better" than hiring someone with no record. And, their retention is better. In HR, that's considered a homerun.
All mythology and ancient racism aside, businesses have come to realize more and more that hiring folks with records is not only the right thing to do, but it's very good business. QED
I find this almost impossible to believe. I know and org where someone did not check records, ended up hiring a sex offender. Of all the people THIS person DID do something wrong. They had tons of employees. They got screwed for not actively discriminating against folks with a record. Will the federal govt bond program you mention pay the multi-million dollar settlement they had to pay out. I doubt it. Livescan checks are absolutely required here in CA, and if you hire someone who has disqualifying events it's a major deal. I haven't looked into recidivism data, but got to believe there is some data to support these types of policies.
At first, human resource departments thought I was nuts, but eventually they came around, and we turned profitable. Unfortunately, our timing wasn't so good because that coincided with the onset of Covid, when companies laid off tens of millions of workers.I tried holding out, but it took years to normalize. I had no choice but to shut down. That announcement (and the support it engendered also was enormous.)
I've continued with this work, and now am helping run a very similar staffing company, a division of a much larger business, 2C Workforce Solutions (2CCareers.com). I'll get to the point:
If you or anyone you know are in need of workers anywhere in the US, we can help. Studies have shown that those with records "are as good as--if not better than--those with no records." As a staffing company, we remain their employer and handle all the paperwork, payroll, taxes, etc. And of course, there's the very important social good being done.
If you've got (or can connect me to) a company that's got at least 100 employees, I'd very much appreciate the opportunity to connect. And for all of the incredible support, enthusiasm and great ideas in the past, thanks HN community!